In June 2011, the United States Supreme Court notably held that the members of a class action lawsuit, alleging gender discrimination against Wal-Mart, did not have enough in common to continue to sue as a class. The Supreme Court specifically found that the individual circumstances of the over 1 million female employees nationwide were too diverse and therefore could not satisfy the class action requirement that common questions of law or fact must exist between all class members. The Court, however, did not rule on the merits of the discrimination claims.
In response to this ruling, five of these original Plaintiffs have narrowed their lawsuit by naming just California stores as Defendants in their class action. These women filed suit on October 27, 2011 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. This amended lawsuit asserts that Wal-Mart stores in California failed to promote women and paid women less than equally qualified men in similar positions. For instance, the amended lawsuit alleges that a California Regional Vice President suggested that women did not seek management positions because of their "family commitments," and that a California District Manager reasoned that he needed to pay a male employee more than a female employee because the male employee "supports his wife and two kids."
At least 95,000 current and former female employees of Wal-Mart may be covered by this new complaint.
Attorneys for the Plaintiffs plan to re-file similar lawsuits in other states and regions across the country.